Page 136 - GOLDAIR HANDLING APOLOGISMOS 2018

REPORT 2018

on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional Financial Statements 2018 of Goldair Aviation Handling S.A. to the Report Evaluation Form
competence and due care, confidentiality and professional relevant -within our agreed scope- sections of the Report. To obtain

behaviour. a thorough understanding of the Company’s financial results and
By filling out the evaluation form to let us know what you think of the 2018 Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Development Report,
A limited assurance engagement on a sustainability report financial position, the 2018 audited financial statements should
you are actively contributing towards improving our future Reports.
consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible be consulted. The scope of our work did not include the review /
for the preparation of information presented in the sustainability testing of the operating effectiveness of the information systems
What is your opinion of Goldair Handling’s 2018 Corporate Social Responsibility
report, and applying analytical and other evidence gathering used to collect and aggregate data in relation to the agreed
and Sustainable Development Report, taking the following criteria into account?
procedures, as appropriate. These procedures included: assurance scope.
• Inquiries of Management to gain an understanding of the The extent of evidence gathering procedures performed in a Probably Probably No opinion /
Disagree disagree agree Agree do not know /
Company’s processes, on a sample basis, for determining the limited assurance engagement is less than that for a reasonable no response
material issues for its key stakeholder groups. assurance engagement, and therefore a lower level of assurance
The Report provides an
• Interviews with relevant staff at the Company level on a sample is provided. overall picture of Goldair
Handling’s activities in
basis, concerning sustainability policies for material issues, and Based on the procedures performed, as described above, nothing Sustainable Development
areas
the implementation of these across the business. has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the
• Interviews with relevant Company staff responsible for General Disclosures and the Topic Specific Disclosures marked The information included in
the Report is comprehensive
providing information in the Report, during which we also with the symbol “4” in the GRI Content Index table of the Report, and easy to understand
reviewed on a sample basis, systems and/ or processes for for the period 1 January 2018 – 31 December 2018, are not fairly
information management, internal control and processing of the stated in all material respects.
The Report covers the
qualitative and quantitative information, at the Company level. Our assurance report is made solely to the Company in
information you need
In this context, we tested on a sample basis, the reliability of the accordance with the terms of our engagement. Our work has been
underlying text and/ or data references mentioned in the General undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters

Disclosures and the Topic Specific Disclosures of our agreed we have been engaged to state in this assurance report and for
assurance scope. no other purpose. We do not accept or assume responsibility to
• Visits to the central offices of the Company in Athens, where anyone other than Goldair Aviation Handling S.A. for our work, for What is your opinion of the sections of the Report?
we reviewed, on a sample basis, the procedures of developing this assurance report, or for the conclusions we have reached. Please choose accordingly:
(1) Improvement required, (2) Good, (3) Very Good, (4) Excellent 1 2 3 4
and managing the content of the Report, as well as the current
structure of the Corporate Governance in sustainability issues. 1. How would you rate section “1. Goldair Handling: An Overview”?
• Comparing the information presented in the Report within
2. How would you rate section “2. Goldair Handling Bulgaria”?
our agreed assurance scope to corresponding information in the
relevant underlying sources, on a sample basis, to determine 3. How would you rate section “3. Corporate Governance”?
whether the relevant information contained in such underlying
4. How would you rate section “4. Responsible operation and development”?
sources has been included in the Report.
• Reading the information presented in the Report within
5. How would you rate section “5. Our people”?
our agreed assurance scope, to determine on a sample basis, KPMG Advisors Single Member S.A.

whether it is in line with our overall knowledge of, and experience 6. How would you rate section “6. Health and Safety”?
with, the sustainability performance of the Company.
7. How would you rate section “7. Environmental responsibility"?
Where financial information (text and/ or data) subject to the
statutory auditor’s scope has been utilised within the agreed George Raounas 8. How would you rate section “8. Goldair Handling’s social contribution”?

assurance scope, our work was limited to the reliability check of Partner
9. General - Overall impression of the Report
the transfer of these text/ data from the audited and published Athens, 25 July 2019

134 135